Disinfection of drinking water: problems and solutions

The basic criteria of quality of drinking water which were formulated in middle of the twentieth century, consist of the following: drinking water should be safe in epidemic relation, it should be harmless in it's chemical structure and have favorable organoleptic properties. Now these criteria are accepted all over the world. The normative documents are created in the field of drinking water quality in the various countries, including in Russia - SanPin 2.1.4.1074-01. The same criteria are a basis for the Manual on quality surveillance of drinking water, issued by the world organization of public health, in 1984 and 1994. At estimation of risk to health, the most important role is played by microbiological pollutions. So, the researches of Dr. Robert Tardiff (USA) have shown, that danger of diseases caused by microbiological pollution of water is many thousand times higher (up to 100000 times), than at pollution of water by different chemicals. This estimation is most evidently expressed in existing practice of drinking water disinfection in the majority of developed countries. For example, 98,6 % of drinking water is chlorinated in the USA. Ozonation makes only 0,37 %, other methods - 0,75 %. The reason is, that chlorination is the most economic and effective method of drinking water disinfection in comparison with any other known methods. Chlorination provides microbiologically safe water in any point of the distribution network at any moment due to the "aftereffect". All other methods of water disinfection, including ozonation and ultra-violet, do not provide a disinfection aftereffect and, hence, require chlorination on one of the stages of water processing. This rule is not an exception for Russia where all ozonation systems of drinking water in municipal water-distribution networks contain the equipment for chlorination. One of the disadvantages of water chlorination process is the disinfection by-products (HCP) formation, the most of which are trihalomethanes (THM): chloroform, dichlorobrommethane, dibromochlormethane and bromoform. The trihalomethanes are formed from variety of organic precursors in chlorination-disinfection process. The THM formation reactions are some of the slowest reactions. The THM formation occurs over several hours, and the amount increases after 24 hours. The kinetics of THM formation depends on many factors such as pH, residual chlorine concentration. Therefore, the application of sodium or calcium hypochlorite for water disinfection as alternative to molecular chlorine does not reduce but considerably increases probability of THM formation. The most rational way for reduction of chlorination by-products formation is the reduction of precursors concentration prior to disinfection stage. Today, the maximum allowable levels of total chlorination by-products are set from 0,06 to 0,2 mg/l in developed countries and correspond to modern scientific facts on any adverse effects on human health. Scientific discussion on the carcinogenic and mutagenic toxicity of THMs has been lasted for many years in the USA and it has been recognized that the level of THM formation through water disinfection is safe for the above mentioned levels. However, the reduction of chlorination by-products, as well as by-products of ozonation which are not less dangerous (see table) than chlorination by-products, is one of the reasons to search for new technologies for drinking water disinfection. Table shows known advantages and disadvantages of basic and alternative methods and technologies of water disinfections.
The characteristics of some water disinfectants The analysis of the data, presented in table, allows to understand, that among known methods there is no ideal one, as well as there is no recipe of "ideal drinking water" with all importance of its parameters for public health effect and safety. It is obvious, that parameters and properties of drinking water are determined by geographical, geological, climatic, hydrological conditions and regional differences in a degree and level of territorial economic development. That is why regulation of drinking water quality in developed countries is based on authentic, scientifically proved specifications of its microbiological (priority parameter) and chemical parameters in respect of safety and harmlessness for the human being and defines the order of drinking water quality control. This order takes into account regional water sources, methods of water processing and its delivery to consumers. For modern technologies of water disinfection the most important task is the development of the combined methods utilizing the advantages of the known disinfectants (table) and eliminating their disadvantages. In Russia disinfection of water for household and drinking purposes oxidants solution is carried out in accordance with the requirements of SanPiN 2.1.4.1074-01.
The name and
characteristicsAdvantages
Disadvantages
Basic-type disinfectants
Chlorine
Is applied in a gaseous form
and requires strictest safety measures
Sodium hypochlorite
Is applied in a liquid form (trade concentration - 10 -12 %), can be obtained on-site through electrochemical generation.
Chlorine dioxide
On-site generation only. Commonly excepted as the most effective disinfectant among other chlorine containing agents for water treatment at alkaline pH levels
Chloramine
Is formed by mixing of ammonia with free available chlorine.
Alternative disinfectants
Ozone
Has been used for several decades for taste and odor control, color removal and disinfection
Ultraviolet
Exposing water to UV radiation effectively inactivates various microorganisms